Eating Hubs in Multiple Sclerosis: Exploring the Relationship Between Mediterranean Diet and Disability Status in Italy.

Background: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a complex disease in which multiple factors contribute to disability accrual. Mediterranean Diet (MeDi) has shown beneficial effects across neurodegenerative diseases. We hypothesize that specific food habits, rather than global adherence to MeDi, might impact on MS. We aimed to (i) evaluate differences in adherence to MeDi between people living with MS (PwMS) and healthy controls (HC); (ii) characterize eating patterns in PwMS and HC, identifying the most influential MeDi items for each group by the use of network analysis; (iii) explore the relationship between patients' eating habits and disability. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we consecutively recruited 424 PwMS and 165 matched HC. Data were obtained through the administration of self-reported questionnaires. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) were evaluated in the MS population. We performed between-groups comparisons via unpaired two-sample t-test and X2 test as appropriate. We calculated food networks in both MS cases and HC using and tested the association between hub nodes and disability. Finally, we conducted a post-hoc analysis, investigating the relationship between food items, lifestyle factors (smoking, exercise) and clinical outcomes. Results: Most participants adhered sufficiently to MeDi. Exploring each group separately, fruit, vegetables, cereal, and fish were identified as hubs in PwMS, while meat and alcohol were identified as hubs in HC. Hubs were all inter-correlated, indicating that eating habits of PwMS include a large intake of all the foods identified as hubs. EDSS was predicted by the intake of vegetables (beta = -0.36, p < 0.03) and fish (beta = -0.34, p < 0.02). The model including smoking pack/year, International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) score and intake of "negative foods" predicted 6% of the variance in EDSS (p < 0.001), while the model including smoking pack/year and IPAQ score predicted 4% of the variance in FSS (p < 0.001). Conclusions: We identified a sufficient adherence to MeDi in our population. PwMS showed overall a healthier dietary pattern than HC. Vegetables and fish intake were associated with disability outcomes. Future longitudinal studies applying integrated approaches are needed to understand lifestyle added value to the use of standard pharmacological therapies.

A matter of atrophy: differential impact of brain and spine damage on disability worsening in multiple sclerosis.

As atrophy represents the most relevant driver of progression in multiple sclerosis (MS), we investigated the impact of different patterns of brain and spinal cord atrophy on disability worsening in MS. We acquired clinical and MRI data from 90 patients with relapsing-remitting MS and 24 healthy controls (HC). Clinical progression at follow-up (mean 3.7 years) was defined according to the Expanded Disability Status Scale-Plus. Brain and spinal cord volumes were computed on MRI brain scans. After normalizing each participants' brain and spine volume to the mean of the HC, z-score cut-offs were applied to separate pathologically atrophic from normal brain and spine volumes (accepting a 2.5% error probability). Accordingly, MS patients were classified into four groups (Group I: no brain or spinal cord atrophy N = 40, Group II: brain atrophy/no spinal cord atrophy N = 11, Group III: no brain atrophy/ spinal cord atrophy N = 32, Group IV: both brain and spinal cord atrophy N = 7). All patients' groups showed significantly lower brain volume than HC (p < 0.0001). Group III and IV showed lower spine volume than HC (p < 0.0001 for both). Higher brain lesion load was identified in Group II (p = 0.049) and Group IV (p = 0.023) vs Group I, and in Group IV (p = 0.048) vs Group III. Spinal cord atrophy (OR = 3.75, p = 0.018) and brain + spinal cord atrophy (OR = 5.71, p = 0.046) were significant predictors of disability progression. The presence of concomitant brain and spinal cord atrophy is the strongest correlate of progression over time. Isolated spinal cord atrophy exerts a similar effect, confirming the leading role of spinal cord atrophy in the determination of motor disability.

Cognitive fatigability is a quantifiable distinct phenomenon in multiple sclerosis.

Cognitive fatigability in multiple sclerosis represents the decrease in cognitive performance over time. It is a frequent symptom that negatively affects quality of life and ability to work. There are no objective measures of cognitive fatigability. This study aimed at quantifying cognitive fatigability despite the learning effect and to clarify whether cognitive fatigability represents a free-standing phenomenon rather than an aspect of cognitive impairment. We measured information processing speed with the Symbol Digit Modalities Test, and the number of right answers was recorded every 30 s for 180 s. We approximated the number of right answers as function of time with two logarithmic models, one including a first-order term alone and the other adding also a second-order term. The coefficient of the latter (B) may quantify performance deflection and may represent cognitive fatigability. We tested 173 patients with multiple sclerosis, including 119 cognitively impaired and 54 cognitively preserved patients, and 35 healthy subjects. The performance of cognitively preserved patients showed a deflection at the end of task that was detected neither in controls nor in cognitively impaired patients and needed a second-order term to be approximated (p < .03, F = 14.02). B was explained neither by depression nor fatigue. We proposed for the first time a method to quantify cognitive fatigue via a second-order least square fit model, easily usable in the clinical practice. By using this novel approach, cognitive fatigability results to be a free-standing phenomenon that is more evident in cognitively preserved than in cognitive impaired patients.

Effect of dalfampridine on information processing speed impairment in multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: To test a possible benefit of dalfampridine on information processing speed (IPS), a key function for cognitive impairment (CogIm) in multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we included patients with a score on the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) under the 10th percentile of the reference value. Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive dalfampridine 10 mg or placebo twice daily for 12 weeks. They underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation at screening (T0), at the end of treatment (T1), and after a 4-week follow-up (T2). The primary endpoint was improvement in SDMT. RESULTS: Out of 208 patients screened, 120 were randomized to receive either dalfampridine (n = 80) or placebo (n = 40). At T1, the dalfampridine group presented an increase of SDMT scores vs placebo group (mean change 9.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.5-11.4] vs 5.2 [95% CI 2.8-7.6], p = 0.0018; d = 0.60 for raw score; and 0.8 [95% CI 0.6-1] vs 0.3 [95% CI 0.0-0.5], p = 0.0013; d = 0.61 for z scores; by linear mixed model with robust standard error). The improvement was not sustained at T2. A beneficial effect of dalfampridine was observed in the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test and in cognitive fatigue. CONCLUSION: Dalfampridine could be considered as an effective treatment option for IPS impairment in MS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 2013-002558-64 EU Clinical Trials Register. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that for patients with MS with low scores on the SDMT, dalfampridine improves IPS.

Investigating the phenomenon of "cognitive-motor interference" in multiple sclerosis by means of dual-task posturography.

BACKGROUND: Two simultaneously performed tasks may compete for common brain network resources in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), suggesting the occurrence of a cognitive-motor interference. While this phenomenon has been well described for walking and gait, data on static balance are scarce. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 92 patients and 46 sex/age-matched healthy controls (HCs) were tested by means of static posturography under eyes opened (single-task condition) and while performing the Stroop word-colour task (dual-task condition), to estimate the dual-task cost (DTC) of standing balance. The patient group also underwent the Expanded Disability Status Scale, 25-foot walking test, 12-item MS walking scale, Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, and Symbol Digit Modalities Test. RESULTS: Patients had larger postural sway under both single-task and dual-task conditions (p<0.001), as well as greater DTC of standing balance (p=0.021) than HCs. Although secondary progressive (SP) patients had larger sway in both conditions than relapsing-remitting (RR) patients (p<0.05), these latter ones exhibited a greater DTC of postural balance (p=0.045). Deficits in sustained attention and information processing speed, as assessed by the SDMT, were also independently associated with the magnitude of DTC of standing balance (p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The phenomenon of cognitive-motor interference might be unmasked by a dual-task posturography and was associated with impaired sustained attention and information processing speed, especially in RR patients. The smaller DTC of standing balance observed in SP patients may be due to the ceiling effect of postural sway, or alternatively to the lack of postural reserve which constrained the more disabled patients to prioritize the balance over the cognitive task.